On Tuesday, June 29, 2010, mark gross wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:42:22PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > A lot of the pm_qos extremal value handling is really duplicating what a > > priority ordered list does, just in a less efficient fashion. Simply > > redoing the implementation in terms of a plist gets rid of a lot of this > > junk (although there are several other strange things that could do with > > tidying up, like pm_qos_request_list has to carry the pm_qos_class with > > every node, simply because it doesn't get passed in to > > pm_qos_update_request even though every caller knows full well what > > parameter it's updating). > > > > I think this redo is a win independent of android, so we should do > > something like this now. > > Thank you for doing this!, I'll integrate it into some testing targets > in the morning! > > Signed-off-by: mark gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --mgross > > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> Applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next. Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
