On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:59:07 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So how does this look? If "OK" then would you be able to test it please?
I saw it first!
fix !CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
--- a/include/linux/tick.h~cpuidle-avoid-using-smp_processor_id-in-preemptible-code-nr_iowait_cpu-v4-fix-fix
+++ a/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ struct tick_sched {
};
extern void __init tick_init(void);
-extern void __init tick_sched_init(void);
extern int tick_is_oneshot_available(void);
extern struct tick_device *tick_get_device(int cpu);
@@ -93,6 +92,9 @@ extern struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcas
# ifdef CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT
extern struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask(void);
+extern void __init tick_sched_init(void);
+# else
+static inline void tick_sched_init(void) { }
# endif
# endif /* BROADCAST */
_
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
