On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:50:29 +0300 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > hmm this part is wrong > > you pick the current cpu, rather than the one denoted by ts..... > > > > Hmm. Thanks, good catch. > Well, there is something I'm missing. How can I match given *ts and > cpu in update_ts_time_stats (except for introducing > update_ts_time_stats(..., int cpu)) ? that'd be option one option two is to add a "cpu" member to struct tick_sched..... if you go for option one, I'd replace the ts argument with the cpu argument..... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
