Re: [PATCH 1/2] suspend: Move NVS save/restore code to generic suspend functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:32:19AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Well... should we only do it in 'platform' hibernation mode? There are
> > > machines that predate windows/acpi and still should hibernate.
> > 
> > If they predate acpi then they won't declare any NVS regions.
> 
> What if they're ACPI and APM capable, and in APM mode?  Would the code need
> to guard against that?

I can't imagine any case where that would cause problems, but if it does 
then it's an easy fix.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux