Re: [PATCH 1/2] suspend: Move NVS save/restore code to generic suspend functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > To be honest, I just want to get some feedback on this.
> > > This was major issue that kept me from using otherwise prefect suspend
> > > to ram.
> > 
> > I think this is a change we should try, but there is a chance it will break
> > some systems.
> I doubt that. BIOSes are tested against windows, and since it has this
> behavior, all systems this patch could break wouldn't work in windows
> ether.
> 
> I was doing all kinds of attempts to fix this bug, and finally I found
> the cause for it.

Well... should we only do it in 'platform' hibernation mode? There are
machines that predate windows/acpi and still should hibernate.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux