Hi!
> I addressed the comments I got on the previous RFC. I left the handles
> in place, the functions in hibernate_io_ops now works on them. Further
> I got rid of the memory barriers and minimized global variables as much
> as possible. Comments welcome.
It would be good if you carried ack-s from previous rounds, so that I
don't have to review good patches again...
> Some code, which will be moved out of swap.c, will know nothing about
> swap. There will be also other than swap writers later, so that it
> won't make sense at all.
>
> So introduce a new structure called hibernate_io_handle which
> currently contains only a pointer to private data, but is independent
> on I/O reader/writer actually used. Private data are swap_map_handle
> for now.
>
> This structure is allocated in _start and freed in _finish. This will
> correspond to the later introduction of hibernate_io_ops where users
> will do handle=start->repeat{read/write(handle)}->finish(handle).
> I.e. they will operate on handle instead of global variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
ack.
> +/**
> + * hib_io_handle_alloc - allocate io handle with priv_size for private data
> + *
> + * @priv_size: the sie to allocate behind hibernate_io_handle for private use
> + */
> +static inline struct hibernate_io_handle *hib_io_handle_alloc(size_t priv_size)
> +{
> + struct hibernate_io_handle *ret;
> + ret = kzalloc(sizeof(*ret) + priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret)
> + ret->priv = ret + 1;
Uhuh, why this? Aha, grabbing the pointer to priv_size-sized area at
the end of regular struct?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
