On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:00:47 +0200 Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Even worse, the suspend wakelock will keep the > whole kernel active, as opposed to powering off unused devices > separately as it's done in runtime PM. That is not true. While the kernel is not suspended it does runtime pm. > > Users do like that to work too -- I recall Arve leaving a device in > > his filing cabinet with the radio off while he was out of the country > > for three weeks once, and him discovering it was still running with > > something like 25% battery remaining when he returned. > > So what you're actually up to is that a user should restart the phone > and turn the radio off if he wants to find it running when he's back > from a long business trip or something. Nice... ? Cheers, Flo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
