On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:07:41PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:03:31AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 06:50:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > Erm, no it didn't. Should it have? This is what I saw: > > > > > > [ 0.880646] Parentless device registered during a PM transaction > > > > You should have gotten more information than just that single line, > > right? Like a full backtrace to the driver that did the offending > > thing? > > > > It should also have had a "Device: 'device_name_here'" on the line > > before this one, right? > > > > Can you send the full output that happened here? > > Sorry, of course. Here is the trace: > > [ 0.880567] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.880622] WARNING: at drivers/base/power/main.c:101 device_pm_add+0x94/0xd8() > [ 0.880639] Device: ieee80211 Here's the device name. > [ 0.880646] Parentless device registered during a PM transaction > [ 0.880660] Modules linked in: eeti_ts libertas_sdio libertas pxamci ds2760_battery w1_ds2760 wire > [ 0.880754] [<c00493a0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [<c0056db0>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x7c) > [ 0.880793] [<c0056db0>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x7c) from [<c0056e74>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) > [ 0.880829] [<c0056e74>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c01d4cc8>] (device_pm_add+0x94/0xd8) > [ 0.880875] [<c01d4cc8>] (device_pm_add+0x94/0xd8) from [<c01ce4dc>] (device_add+0x350/0x510) > [ 0.880910] [<c01ce4dc>] (device_add+0x350/0x510) from [<c032d500>] (wiphy_register+0x1ac/0x298) > [ 0.881033] [<c032d500>] (wiphy_register+0x1ac/0x298) from [<bf0285dc>] (lbs_cfg_register+0x54/0x9c [libertas]) > [ 0.881142] [<bf0285dc>] (lbs_cfg_register+0x54/0x9c [libertas]) from [<bf02c228>] (lbs_start_card+0xa0/0x130 [libertas]) > [ 0.881226] [<bf02c228>] (lbs_start_card+0xa0/0x130 [libertas]) from [<bf040b94>] (if_sdio_probe+0x84c/0x954 [libertas_sdio]) > [ 0.881276] [<bf040b94>] (if_sdio_probe+0x84c/0x954 [libertas_sdio]) from [<c024fd98>] (sdio_bus_probe+0xcc/0xe8) > [ 0.881322] [<c024fd98>] (sdio_bus_probe+0xcc/0xe8) from [<c01d069c>] (driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x198) > [ 0.881359] [<c01d069c>] (driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x198) from [<c01cfc08>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x4c/0x8c) > [ 0.881396] [<c01cfc08>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x4c/0x8c) from [<c01d08d4>] (device_attach+0x54/0x70) > [ 0.881430] [<c01d08d4>] (device_attach+0x54/0x70) from [<c01cfa2c>] (bus_probe_device+0x28/0x50) > [ 0.881464] [<c01cfa2c>] (bus_probe_device+0x28/0x50) from [<c01ce510>] (device_add+0x384/0x510) > [ 0.881496] [<c01ce510>] (device_add+0x384/0x510) from [<c024fbd4>] (sdio_add_func+0x38/0x54) > [ 0.881527] [<c024fbd4>] (sdio_add_func+0x38/0x54) from [<c024f28c>] (mmc_attach_sdio+0x21c/0x2a8) > [ 0.881581] [<c024f28c>] (mmc_attach_sdio+0x21c/0x2a8) from [<c024b97c>] (mmc_rescan+0x1ec/0x28c) > [ 0.881624] [<c024b97c>] (mmc_rescan+0x1ec/0x28c) from [<c0067a60>] (worker_thread+0x168/0x1f0) > [ 0.881667] [<c0067a60>] (worker_thread+0x168/0x1f0) from [<c006abd8>] (kthread+0x78/0x80) > [ 0.881720] [<c006abd8>] (kthread+0x78/0x80) from [<c00458bc>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) > [ 0.881742] ---[ end trace 919a8d4b06013c07 ]--- > > I've been looking for the string 'phy1' in this dump and couldn't find > it. Hence I considered adding it. > > But ... the backtrace should give enought of a hint, you're right. > > Feel free to drop the patch then. Consider it dropped :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
