On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:17:14PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > If a parentless device was added during a PM transaction, developers > might want to know which device caused the troube. Hence, output the > kobject's name in this case. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Magnus Damm <damm@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/base/power/main.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c > index 941fcb8..9e9fe6a 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void device_pm_add(struct device *dev) > * transition is in progress in order to avoid leaving them > * unhandled down the road > */ > - dev_WARN(dev, "Parentless device registered during a PM transaction\n"); > + dev_WARN(dev, "Parentless device registered during a PM transaction: %s\n", kobject_name(&dev->kobj)); Doesn'tthe dev_WARN call already print the name of the device? Why print it twice? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
