Re: [PATCH 8/8] intel_idle: create a native cpuidle driver for select intel processors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 27 May 2010 07:14:46 -0700
> Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > From: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > This EXPERIMENTAL driver supersedes acpi_idle
>> > on modern Intel processors. (Nehalem and Atom Processors).
>> >
>> > For CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE=y, intel_idle probes before acpi_idle,
>> > no matter if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y or =m.
>> >
>> > Boot with "intel_idle.max_cstate=0" to disable the driver
>> > and to fall back on ACPI.
>> >
>> > CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE=m is not recommended unless the system
>> > has a method to guarantee intel_idle loads before ACPI's
>> > processor_idle.
>> >
>> > This driver does not yet know about cpu online/offline
>> > and thus will not yet play well with cpu-hotplug.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  MAINTAINERS                     |    7 +
>> >  drivers/Makefile                |    2 +-
>> >  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |    6 +-
>> >  drivers/idle/Kconfig            |   11 +
>> >  drivers/idle/Makefile           |    1 +
>> >  drivers/idle/intel_idle.c       |  446
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
>> Any reason this arch-specific driver needs to be in drivers/idle
>> instead of under a platform specific dir like arch/x86?
>> 
>> On embedded SoCs that have never had ACPI, we have our
>> platform-specific CPUidle drivers in with the rest of our platform
>> specific code.
>> 
>
> it's really inconvenient to have such drivers hidden in the
> architecture code;

I'm not sure how puting architecture-specific code into an
architecture-specific directory is hiding it, but maybe I'm missing
something.

> it's much more convenient for cpuidle developers if they're all in
> one place.

So should we move all the embedded SoC specific CPUidle drivers into
drivers/idle too?

To me that would be much less convenient as I expect to maintain my
platform-specific CPUidle driver along with the rest of my
platform-specific code.

Kevin
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux