On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:28:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 15:06 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > one way which indicates to the scheduler that tasks in TASK_RUNNING > > should be scheduled, and when the session is idle we set the flag the > > other way and all processes in that cgroup get shifted to > > TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE or something. > > What's wrong with simply making the phone beep loudly and displaying: > bouncing cows is preventing your phone from sleeping! Well, primarily that it's possible to design an implementation where it *doesn't* prevent your phone froms sleeping, but also because a given application may justifiably be preventing your phone from sleeping for a short while. What threshold do you use to determine the difference? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
