Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Opportunistic suspend support.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Anyway, I think there's been enough arguments against even the concept
> of opportunistic/auto-suspend, and I for one will object with a NAK if
> Rafael send this to Linus.

It's already been submitted to Linus for 2.6.35, but not on LKML:

  https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-May/025811.html

Kevin
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux