On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 02:54 -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: > > I'm not sure what you are proposing that we use instead. Both > user-space and kernel code needs to block suspend. If we don't have > suspend blockers in the kernel then user-space needs to poll when a > driver blocks suspend by returning an error from its suspend hook. In particular I'm suggesting you ditch the /dev/suspend_block thing. With a single suspend manager process that manages the suspend state you can achieve the same goal. When the suspend manager has a !0 busy-task count, it ensures the kernel won't auto-suspend, when it again reaches a 0 busy-task count, it re-instates the auto-suspend feature. That's pretty much what that device would do too. Ideally we would not do the auto-suspend thing at all and have runtime-PM improved. Not running apps when they expect to run is like the world turned upside down. 'Evil' apps could always report themselves as blocker anyway. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
