On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:15 AM, <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 03:32:58PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Another likely reason that that there hasn't been an alternate >> proposal (at least from some of us that are raising concerns) is >> because we already have a working solution to dynamic, system-wide PM >> that is 1) already in mainline and 2) shipping on consumer devices >> with very strict power budgets (as already pointed out in detail by >> Paul[2].) > > The examples cited where the things like the Palm Pre, and the Nokia > N770/800/810 series. #1, what works on one embedded > chipset/architecture might not work on another, and #2, the battery > lifetime on the N770 and N800 (both of which I have) is **appalling** > **bad**. Really? My experience is sort of the opposite. My 3 year old Maemo-based Nokia N800 survived about a week idle. My half-year old HTC HT-03A with Android 1.6 survives a day or three, but not much more. Fortunately the japanese cellphone provider Docomo bundled it with two batteries, haha. =) The Nexus One only came with one battery, but from my perspective it's as good as N800 or maybe even better. In the end, I don't think it's a question of Maemo vs Android here or wakelock vs Runtime PM. I'm sure both would do just fine with enough optimizations. / magnus _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
