On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 03:32:58PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Another likely reason that that there hasn't been an alternate > proposal (at least from some of us that are raising concerns) is > because we already have a working solution to dynamic, system-wide PM > that is 1) already in mainline and 2) shipping on consumer devices > with very strict power budgets (as already pointed out in detail by > Paul[2].) The examples cited where the things like the Palm Pre, and the Nokia N770/800/810 series. #1, what works on one embedded chipset/architecture might not work on another, and #2, the battery lifetime on the N770 and N800 (both of which I have) is **appalling** **bad**. I really don't understand why people are so opposed to merging code that works well for a very large set of devices and products. Just because *you* don't need it is not a sufficiently good reason to argue for it not be merged. If you don't want to use it, then don't CONFIG it in. - Ted _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
