On Monday 10 May 2010, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote: > > > > > > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote: > > > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> > > > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail > > > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the > > > >> power management freezer code. > > > > > > > > I guess these three patches are for me. > > > > > > > > Do you want me to handle them? > > > > > > Yes, please, that would be great. > > > > However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't > > appear to be margeable at this point. Is this correct? > > Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only > checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I > think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point. OK, so I'm going to take patch 15 only for the upcoming merge window. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
