On Friday 07 May 2010, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:27:46 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:41:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Jean, the patch we're discussing depends on the > > > "i2c: Fix bus-level power management callbacks" patch that's in your tree right > > > now. Would it be possible to move the i2c patch to my tree, or alternatively > > > would it be acceptable for you to merge a core PM patch through your tree? > > > > Jean, any updates on this? > > I'm sorry, I never received Rafael's initial message. I just checked > through my mailbox and it isn't there. > > The current status is that patch "i2c: Fix bus-level power management > callbacks" is currently queued in my i2c tree at: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/i2c-fix-bus-level-power-management-callbacks.patch > and is scheduled to be merged in 2.6.35-rc1. If this isn't OK, we can > change the plan. > > Merging a core PM patch through the i2c tree would be quite confusing, > I think, and might draw even more odd dependencies. So I'd rather have > the i2c patch moved to the PM staging tree (or whatever tree the > dependent patch lives in.) Just let me know and I'll drop my copy. The patch above has been applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next along with the Mark's $subject patch. I have converted your sign-off into an ack, hope that's fine. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
