On Thu, 6 May 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:13 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown wrote: > > > > When CONFIG_PM is not set: > > > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_init': > > > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d84): undefined reference to `pm_flags' > > > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d91): undefined reference to `pm_flags' > > > > CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM, > > so acpi/bus.c should not be compiled for CONFIG_PM=n > > > > Hmm, is is somebody doing something strange, like "select ACPI" > > without guaranteeing that all of ACPI's dependencies are satisfied? > > Oh, thanks for the clue. > > That would be a patch that I commented on and was ignored, > but James Morris merged it anyway. Now it should be dropped. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/4/379 You weren't ignored. Mimi responded and mentioned a subsequent patch, after which, there was no further discussion. I've reverted: b89e66e1e396f7b5436af154e58209320cc08aed "TPM: ACPI/PNP dependency removal" a674fa46c79ffa37995bd1c8e4daa2b3be5a95ae "ima: remove ACPI dependency" Note: any further ACPI-related changes here should have acks from linux-acpi folk. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
