Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> When CONFIG_PM is not set:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_init':
> bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d84): undefined reference to `pm_flags'
> bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d91): undefined reference to `pm_flags'

CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM,
so acpi/bus.c should not be compiled for CONFIG_PM=n

Hmm, is is somebody doing something strange, like "select ACPI"
without guaranteeing that all of ACPI's dependencies are satisfied?

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux