2010/4/28 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: > On Thursday 29 April 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: >> 2010/4/28 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: >> > On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: >> >> Add a misc device, "suspend_blocker", that allows user-space processes >> >> to block auto suspend. The device has ioctls to create a suspend_blocker, >> >> and to block and unblock suspend. To delete the suspend_blocker, close >> >> the device. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > ... >> >> + >> >> +#include <linux/fs.h> >> >> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h> >> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> >> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> >> >> +#include <linux/slab.h> >> >> +#include <linux/suspend_blocker.h> >> >> +#include <linux/suspend_block_dev.h> >> >> + >> >> +enum { >> >> + DEBUG_FAILURE = BIT(0), >> >> +}; >> >> +static int debug_mask = DEBUG_FAILURE; >> > >> > What's the exact purpose of this? >> >> To show errors returned to user space. I can turn it off by default if you want. > > Not necessarily, but why is it a mask? It looks like a 0/1 thing would be > sufficient. I may want to add a bit to print all user-space block and unblock calls. > > BTW, I'd put parens around (debug_mask & DEBUG_FAILURE) for clarity. OK. -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm