On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:08 -0400 tytso@xxxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:51:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote: > > > As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation > > > that it would like to share. I have finally gotten around to > > > porting it to v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces. It is > > > provided in the following messages for your review. I realize > > > that when we first discussed this idea, a lot of ideas were > > > presented for enhancing it. Thanks alot for your suggestions. I > > > haven't gotten around to implementing any of them. > > > > .33 is way too old to submit patches against. > > But it's not too old for review purposes; as Salman said, they were > sent to LKML for comments and review. I think it's well understood > that when these patches are ready to be merged, they need to be > submitted right before the merge window opens, against a recent -rc > kernel. s/submitted/refreshed/ ;-) -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
