On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 19:47 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday 30 January 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 01:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I thing the snippet below is a good summary of what this is about. > > > > > > Any progress on that? > > > > Well, I'm waiting for you to report back: > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/74740/ > > > > The patch is appended once again for convenience. > > Ah, sorry! > > I used the second version (with the locks) and it works for sure (~500 > cycles) > > However, as I discovered today, it takes the lock also for GFP_ATOMIC, > and thats why I see several backtraces in the kernel log. Anyway this > isn't important. > > I forgot all about this patch, and I am compiling the kernel right away. > Will put the kernel through the hibernate loop tonight. I did 123 hibernate cycles on my notebook. Everything is fine. This patch very very likely is working. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
