On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 19:47 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday 30 January 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 01:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I thing the snippet below is a good summary of what this is about. > > > > Any progress on that? > > Well, I'm waiting for you to report back: > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/74740/ > > The patch is appended once again for convenience. Ah, sorry! I used the second version (with the locks) and it works for sure (~500 cycles) However, as I discovered today, it takes the lock also for GFP_ATOMIC, and thats why I see several backtraces in the kernel log. Anyway this isn't important. I forgot all about this patch, and I am compiling the kernel right away. Will put the kernel through the hibernate loop tonight. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
