On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > The ideal behavior would be: > > > > > > > > > > if(disk is spun up) > > > > > then let the sync happen > > > > > > > > I'm not against that. Patch welcome. :-) > > > > > > I'd say such knob would be ugly. > > > > Define "ugly", please. > > Per-system property, which should better be > per-program-that-requires-suspend. You request suspend without syncing > (you want it quick, battery is 90%), then the battery runs low, and > system daeomn requests s2ram, not realizing that someone disabled sync > from under him. I really prefer a per-system setting. The program that wants to sync anyway can easily do that by itself. > > > But maybe acceptable way would be echo mem-nosync > power, or maybe it can > > > already be done using s2disk ioctl interface...? > > > > Nope. > > Nope what? > > AFAICT no new interface is needed. Just do SNAPSHOT_FREEZE, then > _S2RAM then _UNFREEZE. That's not quite straightforward and I wouldn't seriously suggest that to anyone. Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
