> > > > The ideal behavior would be: > > > > > > > > if(disk is spun up) > > > > then let the sync happen > > > > > > I'm not against that. Patch welcome. :-) > > > > I'd say such knob would be ugly. > > Define "ugly", please. Per-system property, which should better be per-program-that-requires-suspend. You request suspend without syncing (you want it quick, battery is 90%), then the battery runs low, and system daeomn requests s2ram, not realizing that someone disabled sync from under him. > > But maybe acceptable way would be echo mem-nosync > power, or maybe it can > > already be done using s2disk ioctl interface...? > > Nope. Nope what? AFAICT no new interface is needed. Just do SNAPSHOT_FREEZE, then _S2RAM then _UNFREEZE. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
