On Wednesday 06 January 2010, Bartłomiej Zimoń wrote: > Dnia 6 stycznia 2010 0:05 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > Well, I think you have some specific issue with pm-utils, but you're not > > telling us what it is. So, why exactly is pm-utils not suitable for your > > needs? > > > > Rafael to be honest it's more dbus specific. I'm talking about > dbus as it is standard for system<->apps communication. That was my impression. :-) Well, I don't like dbus too, but ... > But please understand if we'll create kernel device with simple pm notification > It could be hooked by udev and next ... by DeviceKit-power/upower and after that > we have real standard. But to have this we must export "power" device - something > like my proof-of-concept module. This could be realy good start. ... that doesn't make me think it should be sneakily replaced with "magic" kernel modules or similar stuff. As I already said many times in this thread before, please look for a solution in the user space. Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
