Dnia 6 stycznia 2010 0:05 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> napisał(a): > Well, I think you have some specific issue with pm-utils, but you're not > telling us what it is. So, why exactly is pm-utils not suitable for your > needs? > Rafael to be honest it's more dbus specific. I'm talking about dbus as it is standard for system<->apps communication. But please understand if we'll create kernel device with simple pm notification It could be hooked by udev and next ... by DeviceKit-power/upower and after that we have real standard. But to have this we must export "power" device - something like my proof-of-concept module. This could be realy good start. Best regards. Bartłomiej Zimoń PLD Linux, Kadu Team, FreeRunner user http://kadu-im.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
