Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> What fact?  The only thing that matters is USB?  For resume, it is.  For
> suspend, it clearly isn't.

For suspend, the only other case we've seen has been the keyboard and 
mouse controller, which has exactly the same "we can special case it with 
a single 'let's do _this_ device asynchronously'". Again, it may not be 
pretty, but it sure is simple.

Much simpler than talking about some generic infrastructure changes and 
about doing "let's do leaves of the tree separately" schemes.

And that's why I'm _soo_ unhappy with you, and am insulting you. Because 
you keep on making the same mistake over and over - overdesigning.

Overdesigning is a SIN. It's the archetypal example of what I call "bad 
taste". I get really upset when a subsystem maintainer starts 
overdesigning things.

			Linus
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux