On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Because the PCI bridges are not the only case where it matters (I'd say they > are really a corner case). Basically, any two async devices separeted by a > series of sync ones are likely not to be suspended (or resumed) in parallel > with each other, because the parent is usually next to its children in dpm_list. Give a real example that matters. Really. How hard can it be to understand: KISS. Keep It Simple, Stupid. I get really tired of this whole stupid async discussion, because you're overdesigning it. To a first approximation, THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS USB. Linus _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
