Re: GPF in run_workqueue()/list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next) on resume (was: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:33:00PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -145,6 +255,7 @@ static void __queue_work(struct cpu_work
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +	debug_work_activate(work);
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&cwq->lock, flags);
>  	insert_work(cwq, work, &cwq->worklist);



Since you are doing that from insert_wq_barrier too, which
endpoint is also insert_work(), why not put debug_work_activate
there instead? Or may be you really prefer to do this outside
the spinlock (which in off-case is zero-overhead). May be that
can sleep or?

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux