Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 21:24:33 schrieb Oleg Nesterov: > > So, it looks like the bug is in btusb_destruct(), which should call > > cancel_work_sync() on data->waker before freeing 'data'. I guess it > > should do the same for data->work. > > Or. btusb_suspend() and btusb_close() do cancel_work_sync(data->work), > perhaps they should cancel data->waker as well, I dunno. > > I added Oliver to cc. btusb_close() must do it. btusb_suspend() must not do it. Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
