On 11/11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > Rafael, could you reproduce the problem with the debugging patch below? > > It tries to detect the case when the pending work was corrupted and > > prints its work->func (saved in the previous item). It should work > > if the work_struct was freed and poisoned, or if it was re-initialized. > > See ck_work(). > > I applied the patch and this is the result of 'dmesg | grep ERR' after 10-or-so > consecutive suspend-resume and hibernate-resume cycles: > > [ 129.008689] ERR!! btusb_waker+0x0/0x27 [btusb] > [ 166.477373] ERR!! btusb_waker+0x0/0x27 [btusb] > [ 203.983665] ERR!! btusb_waker+0x0/0x27 [btusb] > [ 241.636547] ERR!! btusb_waker+0x0/0x27 [btusb] > > which kind of confirms my previous observation that the problem was not > reproducible without Bluetooth. Great, thanks. > So, it looks like the bug is in btusb_destruct(), which should call > cancel_work_sync() on data->waker before freeing 'data'. I guess it should > do the same for data->work. Or. btusb_suspend() and btusb_close() do cancel_work_sync(data->work), perhaps they should cancel data->waker as well, I dunno. I added Oliver to cc. Oleg. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
