Re: Massive ext4 filesystem corruption after a failed s2disk/ram cycle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:18:05AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:14:10PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> > > For what it is worth, I would also be quite interested to know
> > > /why/ XFS is bad in this regard.  Is it just the previously
> > > stated "XFS writes to disk despite freezing kernel threads"
> > > issue, or something deeper?
> > 
> > sync pushes out all data to disk, but in a journaling filesystem
> > that might just but the log not the "normal" place on disk.  For
> > a boot loader to deal with it properly it actually needs to do
> > an replay of the log.  Grub does so for reiserfs but not for XFS
> > for some reason.  I don't know why problems don't trigger more
> > often with ext3, though.
> 
> I'm sorry for the long delayed and offtopic responce. I discussed
> this issue with okuji-san (GRUB2 maintainer) at several month ago.
> He really wish linux implement real sync.
> 
> A bootloader has much constraint than OS (mainly caused by size
> constraint).  it can't implemnt jornal log replay logic for _all_
> filesystem.  Why can't we implement storong sync syscall? I don't
> think this is PM nor bootloader fault.

We already have an ioctl that does what you want: FIFREEZE.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux