On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Alternatively, you could introduce a new flag IRQF_NOSUSPEND and use that > >> instead of IRQF_TIMER. That would be cleaner than using IRQF_TIMER for > >> non-timer interrupts IMHO. > > > > I totally agree. The current patch is still good for stable though. > > > > I'll send it to Greg after I've upstreamed it, we can introduce IRQF_NOSUSPEND > > in a second patch. > > How's upstreaming going? I can neither find the patch in Linus branch, > nor in linux-next. Could it be that it got lost? More likely Ben didn't have the time to work on it. Best, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
