Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Alternatively, you could introduce a new flag IRQF_NOSUSPEND and use that >> instead of IRQF_TIMER. That would be cleaner than using IRQF_TIMER for >> non-timer interrupts IMHO. > > I totally agree. The current patch is still good for stable though. > > I'll send it to Greg after I've upstreamed it, we can introduce IRQF_NOSUSPEND > in a second patch. How's upstreaming going? I can neither find the patch in Linus branch, nor in linux-next. Could it be that it got lost? Cheers, Jan _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
