On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:07 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote:> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:14:43AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:> > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 18:41 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote:> > > Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> writes:> > > >> > > > Currently, in order to make sure that it won't bring any side effects,> > > > I only convert the ACPI battery and i8042 to use this framework, which reduces> > > > 0.5s+ S3 time(suspend time plus resume time), from 7.0s to less than 6.5s. > > > > > > 10.5s+ was intended I guess?> > > > > what do you mean?> > I am confused by you writing> > "reduces <small number> from <much larger number> to <still larger number>"> > So I assumed you dropped a decimal on <small number>> sorry for my poor English. I mean the total S3 time (including kernel suspend and kernel resume)reduces more than 0.5 second.it takes 7.0s without this patch set and now it takes only 6.5s. thanks,rui _______________________________________________linux-pm mailing listlinux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
