On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:14:43AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 18:41 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > Currently, in order to make sure that it won't bring any side effects, > > > I only convert the ACPI battery and i8042 to use this framework, which reduces > > > 0.5s+ S3 time(suspend time plus resume time), from 7.0s to less than 6.5s. > > > > 10.5s+ was intended I guess? > > > what do you mean? I am confused by you writing "reduces <small number> from <much larger number> to <still larger number>" So I assumed you dropped a decimal on <small number> > > the kernel device suspend time is reduced from 3.2s to 2.8s after > applying this patch set in my test box. > And I get more optimistic numbers on another laptop, an Eeepc 901, > from about 2s to 1.6s. And the shutdown time is also reduced 0.4s. I think I am still confused by your numbers. How do the 0.5s and the 7.0s relate? -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
