Re: cpuidle C-state accounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> In code I've used I don't demote other states.  But there are state aborts.  In those cases residency is low or 0.

Indeed, its the residency=0 cases that the patch I sent in my last
mail attempts to fix. The idea being, not to increment
target_state->usage if dev->last_residency was 0, i.e. the state
(whether it was the governor recommended state or  safe_state or any
other state) was  not entered or used.

Cheers,
surinder

P.S Richard, pls ignore my other mail with the same content. I goofed
up & missed your email in my inbox and sent the reply out of context.
This mail should link it back to thread.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux