Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



______________________________________________________________> Od: pavel@xxxxxx> Komu: trekker.dk@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: tuxonice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Datum: 11.05.2009 23:24> Předmět: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce>>Hi!>>> >> >To summarise disadvantages:>> >> >>> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC>> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace>> >> >     (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).>> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.>> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing>> >> >>> >> >> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.>> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)>> >> >> >>> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?>> >> Regarding hardware - >> >> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2>> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT>> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II,  AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT >> (binary driver for video card every time)>>Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should>be easy to test with init=/bin/bash.>									Pavel
Yes, that works - and after complete boot w/o loading binary driver resume works too.

_______________________________________________linux-pm mailing listlinux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux