Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 2009-05-08 00:37:39, trekker.dk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Well...
> 
> >
> >
> >To summarise disadvantages:
> >
> >- only core has 8000 LoC
> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
> >     (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
> >
> 
> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
> 

Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux