On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:> On Thu 2009-05-07 20:57:44, Fabio Comolli wrote:...>>>> Well, if I may jump in I suggest you start with the full-memory image>> functionality. This is in my opinion the biggest advantage in tuxonice>> vs. uswsusp.>> Neither tuxonice nor swsusp can write full-memory image (it is mostly> impossible to do in unlikely case of all memory is consumed by> kmalloc). Now, tuxonice can produce bigger images than swsusp...> Pavel, please. (u)swsusp can save images up to half the physicalmemory IIRC; with toi I used to easily save 980MB of image on a 1GBlaptop. You can't honestly compare the two things. > Rafael had short patch for similar efect some time ago, but we could> not find anyone to really review it...> Pavel> -- Regards,Fabio > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html>_______________________________________________linux-pm mailing listlinux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
