Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Matt Price wrote:>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:>> > On Thursday 07 May 2009, U Kuehn wrote:>> >> Pavel Machek wrote:>> >> >> T>> > Also, as you can see from my previous message, I'm not a big fan of fighting>> > over this once again.  Lets try to work together to do something productive>> > instead, shall we?>> >>>>> thank you rafael.  i would really like to see the fighting stop, too.>> Perhaps the best palce to start would be to look directly at the>> patches and, if there are weaknesses, discuss how to improve them?>> Yes, I've talked about that already with Nigel and there's a kind of a plan.>
Well, if I may jump in I suggest you start with the full-memory imagefunctionality. This is in my opinion the biggest advantage in tuxonicevs. uswsusp.

> Thanks,> Rafael
Regards,Fabio


> _______________________________________________> TuxOnIce-devel mailing list> TuxOnIce-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-devel>_______________________________________________linux-pm mailing listlinux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux