2009/5/7 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/5/6 Kim Kyuwon <chammoru@xxxxxxxxx>: >> 2009/5/7 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Kevin Hilman >>> <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>>> On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>>>>> Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> There is at least one problem with that which is why Kyuwon Kim added >>>> the ->disable hook to OMAP's irq_chip. The problem is with drivers >>>> that call disable_irq() in their suspend hook, usually done to prevent >>>> the device from waking the system since on OMAP, any IRQ can be >>>> configured to wake the system. >>>> >>> >>> This does not sound correct. disable_irq_wake should be used for this. >>> A driver may need to mask its interrupt before suspending but this >>> should not also disable it as a wakeup source. >> >> I wish I could use disable_irq_wake(), but it doesn't work in OMAP. > > This does not sound like a hardware problem. We may need advices of TI engineers. However, as far as I know, It is impossible to disable 'interrupt wake-up' with interrupt enabled. Because an interrupt itself generate a system wake-up event in OMAP3430 (Hardware level). -- Kyuwon > -- > Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
