2009/5/6 Kim Kyuwon <chammoru@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/5/7 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Kevin Hilman >> <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>>>> Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> There is at least one problem with that which is why Kyuwon Kim added >>> the ->disable hook to OMAP's irq_chip. The problem is with drivers >>> that call disable_irq() in their suspend hook, usually done to prevent >>> the device from waking the system since on OMAP, any IRQ can be >>> configured to wake the system. >>> >> >> This does not sound correct. disable_irq_wake should be used for this. >> A driver may need to mask its interrupt before suspending but this >> should not also disable it as a wakeup source. > > I wish I could use disable_irq_wake(), but it doesn't work in OMAP. This does not sound like a hardware problem. -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
