On Saturday 14 March 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > > > > > > Ditto > > > > No, because of __setup_irq(). > > Sorry, forgot about that. Ok. Keep the locking in pm.c then. Will do, thanks. OK, it seems we're approaching the final version. :-) I'm going to split the $subject patch as requested by Ingo (API changes and functionality changes) and post the full series once again for completness. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
