Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:31:00 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pm list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200903132256.51522.rjw@xxxxxxx>
References: <200902221837.49396.rjw@xxxxxxx> <200903122243.27452.rjw@xxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903132052240.29264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200903132256.51522.rjw@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> > 
> > Ditto
> 
> No, because of __setup_irq().

Sorry, forgot about that. Ok. Keep the locking in pm.c then.

Thanks,

	tglx


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Rework disabling of interrupts during suspend-resume
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
  - From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki

Prev by Date: Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH][0/8] PM: Rework suspend-resume ordering to avoid problems with shared interrupts
Previous by thread: Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
Next by thread: Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ACPI] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [CPU Freq] [Kernel Newbies] [Fedora Kernel] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]