Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> If IRQ_SUSPENDED _is_ set, then that means that we're after the 
> suspend_late() sequence and before the resume_early() sequence

Sorry, after the suspend, and before the resume.

We could be _in_ the suspend_late/resume_early sequence, but a driver that 
were to try to play with interrupts at that stage would be broken. It 
can't very well do a enable_irq(), because that would be a MAJOR BUG - it 
would make the whole irq suspend thing pointless, since now interrupts 
would start to happen exactly where they must not happen!

			Linus
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux