On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Introduce two helper functions allowing us to prevent device drivers
> > from getting any interrupts (without disabling interrupts on the CPU)
> > during suspend (or hibernation) and to make them start to receive
> > interrupts again during the subsequent resume, respectively. These
> > functions make it possible to keep timer interrupts enabled while the
> > "late" suspend and "early" resume callbacks provided by device
> > drivers are being executed.
> >
> > Use these functions to rework the handling of interrupts during
> > suspend (hibernation) and resume. Namely, interrupts will only be
> > disabled on the CPU right before suspending sysdevs, while device
> > drivers will be prevented from receiving interrupts, with the help of
> > the new helper function, before their "late" suspend callbacks run
> > (and analogously during resume).
> >
> > In addition, since the device interrups are now disabled before the
> > CPU has turned all interrupts off and the CPU will ACK the interrupts
> > setting the IRQ_PENDING bit for them, check in sysdev_suspend() if
> > any wake-up interrupts are pending and abort suspend if that's the
> > case.
> >
>
>
> > +void resume_device_irqs(void)
> > +{
> > + struct irq_desc *desc;
> > + int irq;
> > +
> > + for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc)
> > + if (desc->status & IRQ_SUSPENDED)
> > + enable_irq(irq);
> > +}
>
> I think you need to clear IRQ_SUSPENDED here, not in enable_irq.
enable_irq() clears IRQ_SUSPENDED. This has already been discussed btw.
> > @@ -222,8 +222,9 @@ static void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc
> > WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "Unbalanced enable for IRQ %d\n", irq);
> > break;
> > case 1: {
> > - unsigned int status = desc->status & ~IRQ_DISABLED;
> > + unsigned int status;
> >
> > + status = desc->status & ~(IRQ_DISABLED | IRQ_SUSPENDED);
> > /* Prevent probing on this irq: */
> > desc->status = status | IRQ_NOPROBE;
> > check_irq_resend(desc, irq);
>
> This only clears IRQ_SUSPENDED if the interrupt was not disabled
> elsewhere. If a driver calls interrupt_disable in suspend_late, but
> calls interrupt_enable lazily, resume_device_irqs will reenable the
> interrupt even though the driver has a disable reference.
Then I'd regard the driver as buggy.
> The rest of the patch looks good.
I'm glad you like it.
Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
