Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2009-02-23 15:04:22, Oliver Neukum wrote: >> We can just as well have a class of tasks less important than power >> saving. They'd just run when power saving is not active for some other >> reason. Just like other such schemes we end up with the problem >> of priority inversion with locking. > > Ok, I guess this could be interesting in some cases... maybe. What are > real examples of such tasks? Some people might put casual system monitoring tools into this category--top, xload, gkrellm, xclock, etc. It'd be nice if the animated banner ad in my web browser could be treated this way. :) Chris _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm