Am Freitag 27 Februar 2009 11:18:18 schrieb Pavel Machek: > > We can just as well have a class of tasks less important than power > > saving. They'd just run when power saving is not active for some other > > reason. Just like other such schemes we end up with the problem > > of priority inversion with locking. > > Ok, I guess this could be interesting in some cases... maybe. What are > real examples of such tasks? The classical example is Seti@HOME. Any monitoring tool like umtsmon or kwifimanager. Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
